I suspect that, like myself, a lot of people don't often check that particular sub forum. So this seemed like the next best choice. Obviously any moderator who disagrees will be able to move the thread if they feel it necessary.
Any comment on the article itself?
I'll reserve comment on it, really, when more educated members of the forum talk about the validity of said fundraising campaign.
During the wake of the closing of the game, a lot of people had tried to start up a lot of various fundraising campaigns to try to serve various goals, all of which so far had been mostly ill advised or fraudulent.
That isn't to say that I'm automatically presuming this is one of those situations (hence, reserving judgement), but even somebody with the
best interests of the community and game at heart can jump into murky legal or strategic waters head first.
I'm reminded of an anecdote where a bunch of CoH fans tried to raise money in Mellisa Bianco's name, in a genuine attempt to try to fund efforts to buy the game back from NCSoft and were chastised for it because of the legal problems it could had created, even though they were working in perfectly good faith and just trying their best to help the community, and weren't trying to fraud anybody or do anything wrong.
I'm a bit saddened by the fact that the Plan Z project has splintered into so many competing groups, honestly. I know that it's the official forum position that all these games could be great and there's no reason to stymie competition, and that the forum itself has no want, per say, to bring down other games like Champions Online or even other NCSoft titles, but I always felt that realistically, funding wise, we were going to get
one shot at either buying back CoH or making a spiritual successor game, and that has made me wary of putting money towards competing brands without basically the endorsement of community leaders.
So... I don't really know what to think on the matter.